Which statement best reflects what the written report must contain?

• A. It should be written in first-person commentary.
• B. It may include personal judgments.
• C. It must include factual, objective statements about injuries, condition, or behavior.
• D. It should be a narrative with speculation.

Answer: (C)

Written reports in this context must present facts, not opinions. The best statement is that the written report should include factual, objective statements about injuries, the child’s condition, or observed behavior. This means sticking to what was observed or reported, describing specifics like what injuries were seen, how severe they appeared, what the child said or witnessed, and any actions taken, with dates, times, and locations when possible. Avoid interpreting the situation or drawing conclusions; use neutral, precise language and differentiate between observed facts and judgments or assumptions.

Why the other ideas don’t fit: describing the report in first-person commentary would introduce personal bias, and including personal judgments would undermine the objectivity required. A narrative with speculation introduces guesses about causes or outcomes that aren’t supported by evidence. The focus should be on objective, verifiable details so the report can be reliably used by investigators.