What is the definition of 'hazing' in the context of child abuse?

• A. Hazing is always harmless.
• B. Hazing may constitute physical abuse if it results in physical injury to a child.
• C. Hazing is not a form of abuse when done by peers.
• D. Hazing is only a concern if the victim reports it.

Answer: (B)

Hazing can be abusive when it causes physical harm to a child. In child protection terms, physical abuse includes nonaccidental physical harm that results from actions by others, and hazing activities that lead to injury fall into this category. If hazing results in physical injury, it meets the definition of physical abuse and must be reported. This makes the statement that hazing may constitute physical abuse if it results in physical injury the best fit, because it acknowledges that hazing is not automatically harmless and can cross into abuse.

The other ideas don’t fit because abuse definitions apply regardless of intent or who is performing the act, and mandated reporters are required to report suspected abuse even if the child does not disclose it.